Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Lamar Smith Petitioned in Government Cover-up

Contact : Jesha Miller Breaking News - For Immediate Press Release
1110 Adams Ave.
Evansville In. 47714

Government Cover-up Worst than the Crime
Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith Petitioned to take immediate action in government cover-up.

Just as the cover-up by Jim Tressel was worst than the crime itself, Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith is petitioned to take immediate action in a government cover-up by the U.S. Supreme Court & other officials aiding & abetting Judge David Kiely of Evansville's Vanderburgh County. When the U.S. Supreme Court fails to adhere to the prohibitions & statutes immediate action must be taken because if the highest court is corrupt, then the whole system is corrupt. The motive was to cover-up the Federal Crime by Judge David Kiely pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243, which is the exclusion of jurors on account of race. This violates the Equal Protection Clause, the 13th Amendment which abolished Slavery, the 5th Amendment which holds government to the rule of law, & the 14th Amendment right to due process of law. Mr. Jesha Miller has petitioned 2 million in advance by June 9, 2011 because the trial transcripts affirm it to be true that his race was excluded so that he was held in violation of Constitutional Law # 250.2 (4) which provides: Every Black Man has a right under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, U.S.C.A., that in the selection of jurors to pass on his life, liberty, or property, there shall be no exclusion of his race, & no discrimination against them because of their color. Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 313.

Sincerely - Jesha Miller
June 1, 2011

Attention: U.S. House of Rerpesentatives on the Judiciary Committeee
{ Chairman : Lamar S. Smith }
Certified Mail Receipt # 7011 0110 0000 4542 3445
06/01/2011
Jesha Miller
1110 Adams Ave.
Evansville In. 47714
812-480-9338

I Faxed a complaint to the House Judiciary Committee, Specifically on May 19, 2011 to 202-225-4299 and spoke to the Secretary to have Congressman Trent Franks take action & stop oppression by May 26, 2011. This is due to an EMERGENCY HARDSHIP & due to his delay I suffer from another broke tooth that cuts my tongue, as I needed medical attention. Involved is a Federal Crime by officials pursuant to Title 18 sec. 243 which is the exclusion of jurors on account of race committed by Judge David Kiely. Submitted with the complaint were the trial transcripts affirm to be true, which included 25 pages.
The government violates the unalienable right, in Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s speach, "all men are created equal", which is protected by the 6th Amendment Right to a fair trial & the 14th Amendments right to due process.
THE STATUTORY PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION in the selection of jurors, 18 U.S.C. sec. 243, enacted pursuant to the 14th Amendments enabling clause, makes race neutrality in jury selection A VISIBLE & INEVITABLE MEASURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS OWN COMMITMENT TO THE DEMANDS OF THE CONSTITUTION. THE COURTS ARE UNDER AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO ENFORCE THE STRONG STATUTORY & CONSTITUTIONAL POLICIES EMBODIED IN THAT PROHIBITION. Here, is a violation of the 5th Amendment which holds government to the rule of law & the 13th Amendment which abolished Slavery.

The U.S. Supreme Court committed dereliction of duty to do a cover-up. A Federal Judge, when addressed by a Habes Corpus have a duty to check the records & if true as alleged, immediately release the petitioner from the illegal restraint which was addressed to former Justices Sandra Day O'Connor & John Paul Stevens. The motive was to cover-up the Federal CRIME & deny 10 million dollars upon my release for the illegal restraint. A Habeas Corpus is for a citizen held in violation of the Constitution & laws of the U.S. REMEMBER, THE COURTS ARE UNDER AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO ENFORCE THE STRONG STATUTORY & Constittutional policies embodied in that prohibition. Peters v. Kiff 92 Supreme Court 21770-2171

Immediate action must be taken as this is the inevitable measure of the judicial systems own commitment to the demands of the Constittution.
WHEN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT FAIL TO ADHERE TO THE DEMANDS OF THE CONSTITUTITON & STATUTES IMMEDIATE ACTION MUST BE TAKEN. As Chairman, you, Lamar S. Smith, must make an act of good faith to stop economic oppression & advance 2 million dollars because the motive for the cover-up
was the crime & deny 10 million dollars for thte illegal restraint.
In the words of Brent Musberger of ESPN & Bill Livingston of the Plain Dealer on the cover-up by Jim Tressel causing his resignation. THE COVER-UP IS WORST THAN THE CRIME ITSELF. The crime is against the peace & dignity of the U.S. & is at war with Democracy as Slavery has been abolished & the Constitution guarantees the right to freedom & justice. This being the case, it justifies immediate action. Officials aiding & abetting Judge David Kiely from justice cannot say they had no knowledge of the corruption & Court records affirm they were given opportunity to withdraw by exposing the coruption, rather than continue concealment of the crime, but chose concealment.
Court records affirm that Judges & even U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder refused to enforce the rule of law pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 by indicting & arresting Judge David Kiely. The corrruption committed is that of White Supremist where officials deny
rights protected by the Bill of Rights & are not held accountabble for their actions. The evils of Judicial corruption, oppression, & Slavery have no plave in America anymore so it is in the interest of the Constitution to take immediate action & call a press conference
to inform the media & to stop any further concealment of corruption in the highest court.
As stated by Brent Musberger " we should have learned a lesson after President Nixon left office involving a cover-up. The Subcommittee on the Constitution have jurisdiction over the Constitutional Amendments & ethics in government & failed to give a show of good faith by advancing 2 million dollars to stop economic oppression so that I could take care of my health & welfare problems such as utilities, rent, food, & essentially the basics to survive. As Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, you are now petitioned to take immediate action in a show of good faith by advancing 2 million dollars due to my economic hardship & going public to inform the media & the public of Judicial corruption. This is a historical event as never before has the highest Court been alleged to be corrupt.

Justification to advance money is by the trial transcripts which first prove I was held in violation of the Constitution & Laws of the U.S. Specifically, Constitutional Law # 250. 2 (4) which provides: Every Black Man has a right under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, U.S.C.A., that in the selection of jurors to pass on his life, liberty, or property, there shall be no exclusion of his race, & no discrimination against them because of their color. Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 313.

The exclusion of jurors on account of race is a crime pursuant to Title 18 sec. 243. I, Jesha Miller am a Black Man. Page 246 of the Trial transcripts state; Mr. Vowels: The question to the Judge. At this point there is no black people in the jury & there were no black people in the jury panel. I can tell you that I don't believe the law will support it... Judge Sarah Evans Barker says she don't see this violation. *** Page 247 of the trial transcripts state; Mr. Vowels: My client objects to the fact that none of the venire men nor the jury are black people. He--and that is based upon an assertion that he is entitled to a jury of his peers. The component of race should be included in the concept of peer.

Page 249-250 I don't believe that our venire men are properly selected as the federal government intends for our jurors to be selected. By that I mean I don't think Indiana's in full compliance with the federal government's motor/ voter registration law. As a result of that we don't get a fair cross-section in the venire &, as a result of that my client's rights under the Federal & State Constitution to a fair & impartial jury as mandated through the 14th Amendment & through the federal legislation- I think that's been violated. So, for the record, I make that argument as well.
28 § 1861. Declaration of Policy- All litigants in Federal Courts entitled to trial by jury "shall" have a right to grand & petit juries selected at random from a fair cross section of the community. The record affirms there is no cross section of the community and that there are no blacks. 28 § 1862 Discrimination Prohibited - No citizen "shall" be excluded from service as a grand or petit juror on account of race, color, religion, sex, &`national origin. 28 § 1863 Plan for random jury selection.- Each U.S. District Court "shall" place into operation a written plan for random selection of grand & petit jurors that "shall" be designed to achieve the objectives of sections 1861 & 1862 of this title. The panel "shall" examine the plan to ascertain that it complies with the provisions of this title & "shall" state the particulars in which the plan fails to comply & present within a reasonable time an alternative plan remedying the defects. Here Judge David Kiely overrules the Federal & State Constitution which is mandated through the 14th Amendment which is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Where jury commissioners disqualify citizens on the grounds of race, they fail "to perform their constitutional duty -- recognized by § 4 of the Civil Rights Act of March 1, 1875 . Judge Sarah Evans Barker sees these violations & is CLEARLY aiding & abetting Judge Kiely from the criminal crime committed pursuant to title 18, § 243. *** Judge David Kiely committed the crime with no intention to comply with the demands of the constitution demonstrated by his actions making no effort to remedy the defects.
Thus no state is at liberty to impose upon one charged with crime a discrimination in its trial procedure which the Constitution, & an act of Congress passed pursuant to the Constitution, alike forbid...It is OUR DUTY, as well as the States, to see to it that, throughout the procedure for bring him to justice, he shall enjoy the protection which the Constitution guarantees. Where, as in this case, timely objection has laid bare a discrimination in the selection of grand jurors, the conviction canot stand, because the Constitution prohibits the procedure by which it was obtaines." { Refer to page 247 of transcripts }
Hill v. Texas, 316 U.S. 400, 316 U.S. 404(1942)

The transcripts affirm discrimination which is laid bare by my timely objection so the conviction cannot stand which proves officials violated the 5th, 6th, &* 14th Amendments defaulting on the guaranteed rights under the Bill of Rights to justify advance in money to stop any further oppression because had they followed the rule of law I would already have 10 million for the illegal restraint & 40 million in punitive damages for a total of 50 million dollars. The punitive damages are to deter future corruption by government officials denying those rights guaranteed under the Bill of Rights. This show of good faith must take place immediately to prevent any further damage physically & mentally to the petitioner. This is less than 5% of the money owed him for government defaulting on those rights & the government cover-up
which is worst than the crime. This is not to mention the Constitutional prohibitions that were violated proving that officials had no commitment to the demands of the Constitution prohibiting such acts by officials. There is no excusing the fact that many officials had knowledge of the crime & chose to conceal it rather than expose corruption wherever found as required under the code of ethics.


THE COVER-UP IS WORSE THAN THE CRIME

For this reason a show of good faith by advancing 2 million dollars is a must because government has oppressed me, Jesha Miller in every way to hide Judicial CORRUPTION. Employment is needed for survival & this felony on my record prevents me from having a job right now. Exhibit showing this to be the case is cause for emergency hardship. The case law plainly states the conviction cannot stand because government officials violated the 5th & 14th Amendments so I have been oppressed by the felony on my record preventing me from getting employment so the advance is for my very survival to live, have a place to stay, pay bills & get medical treatment. Having violated the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, & 14th Amendments that are guaranteed by government, rights that government must protect, but officials refused to do in order to continue the cover-up so that officials are not held accountable for the crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 & prevent the operation of the Constitutions checks & balances to conceal corruption throughout the Judicial Branch of government you must advance the 2 million dollars in a show of good faith that you have changed to stop the corruption & uphold the integrity of the Constitution. Because Trent Franks is dragging his feet when he should of did this by May, 26, 2011, shows you are still concealing government corruption. I, Jesha Miller, again ask that you show an act of good faith by advancing 2 million of the 50 million dollars you have defaulted on by violating the 5th & 14th Amendments & denying those rights that government must protect under the Bill of Rights that government must protect. Because they are guaranteed which is a surety of the outcome I would have already been paid the money in case No. 04-7377 in the U.S. Supreme Court were it not for the cover-up as the Courts Motive was to conceal the crime by Judge David Kiely pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 & deny 10 million upon my release for the illegal restraint & 40 million in punitive damages which is to deter other officials from committing these crime that put a Black eye on our government.
Remember, the cover-up is worse that the crime & the crime violates the 13th Amendment which abolished Slavery & is at war with Democracy as our Constitution protects the right to freedom, justice, equality, & the pursuit of happiness.

Respectfully Submitted- Jesha Miller
Date: June 1, 2011


Thursday, May 19, 2011

Jesha Miller Petitions House Judiciary Due to Corruption throughout Judicial Branch
Contact: Jesha Miller FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE1110 Adams Ave.Evansville In. 47714812-480-9338House Judiciary petitioned in Government CorruptionThe House Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over judicial proceedings, civil & criminal, have been petitioned by Jesha Miller due to corruption throughout the Judicial Branch of government.The complaint against the U.S. for denying those rights under the Bill of Rights took Mr. Miller's freedom by Judge David Kiely which under Title 18, sec. 243 is a federal crime that government has tried to cover-up by not addressing the issue & refusing to press charges against a fellow colleague. This is the biggest news story concerning government corruption because President Barack Obama whose duty it is to enforce the federal law has failed in his duty & denied the 1st Amendment right to redress government so this could be corrected. The entire suit against the U.S. is on blog at jeshamillervsbarackobama.blogspot.com.The complaint was faxed to the Subcommittee on the constitution where the Chairman is Trent Franks having jurisdiction over matters such as Constitutional Amendments, Federal civil rights & ethics in government. The charged President Obama, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Federal Judges Sarah Evans Barker, & Federal Judge Richard Young for denying rights under color of law as he is entitled to a trial by jury under the 7th Amendment & all have failed in the performance of their duties which is corruption with it being directly related to their duties. As usual the root of corruption is money & power as the U.S. Supreme Courts motive was to cover-up the Federal Crime which is the exclusion of jurors on account of race & deny Jesha Miller 10 million dollars upon his release from the illegal restraint. Our constitution states no one is above the law, but with officials aiding each other from justice, they are never held accountable while "we the people" continue to have our rights violated by the very officials who are to protect our right to freedom & justice.Respectfully Submitted- Jesha Miller Date: May 19, 2011Complaint below for the media. Exhibit affirming corruption Faxed.202-225-4299 & 202-225-3746 8. page complaint 17 exhibits.To:The House Judiciary Committee2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 p/202-225-3951From: Jesha Miller1110 Adams Ave.Evansville In. 47714812-480-9338The House Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over judicial proceedings, civil & criminal. The Constitutional Amendments, Federal Courts, Judges, & local courts in theterritories & claims against the U.S.I, Jesha Miller, have made a Civil Complaint Against the U.S. [ Case No. 3:11 - cv-013- RLY- WGH ] for officials from President Barack Obama, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Federal Judge Sarah Evans Barker, Federal Judge Richard Young, Public Integrity Section Head- Raymond Hulser, to Congressman Larry Bucshon & Judge David Kiely, all who have failed in their performance of official duties which is political & judicial corruption because it is directly related to their official duty. The motive is to cover-up Judicial corruption which will be exposed by executing the Constitutions checks & balances which have been petititoned by me, Jesha Miller.Money & power are at the root of this corruption throughout the entire Judicial Branch to cover-up the Federal Crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 by Judge David Kiely, which is the exclusion of jurors on account of race & violates the equal protection clause. TheU.S. Supreme Court was petitioned by Habeas Corpus that was addressed to former Justices Sandra Day O'Connor & John Paul Stevens who committed dereliction of duty as they have a duty when addressed by Habeas Corpus to check the records & if true, release the petitioner from the illegal restraint in case No. 04-7377. The motive for oppression & corruption was to cover-up the crime by Judge David Kiely pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 & deny 10 million dollars upon my release from the illegal restraint.Federal Judge Richard Young dismissed the case citing it to be frivolous in order to aid & abet Judge David Kiely from being held accountable for the crime under Title 18, sec. 243& prevent the unprecedented event using the Constitutions checks & balances which would prove corruption throughout the Judicial Branch of government from the U.S. Supreme court on down. First, he could not rule because of a conflict of interest as he was Chief Judge of Vanderburgh County over Judge Kiely who is a collegue when the crime was committed & was sent a letter informing him the crime was going to be committed & he took no action to stop the crime. Second, the Civil Complaint demanded a trial by jury, so in addition to aiding & abetting a criminal from justice he violates my rights under color of law by denying the 7th Amendment right to a trial by jury. Evidence was submitted affirming the Habeas Corpus was addressed to former Justices Sandra Day O'Connor & John Paul Stevens who committed dereliction of duty by having a duty, once addressed by Habeas Corpus to check the records & if true as alleged to release the petitioner, Jesha Miller from the illegal restraint immediately & reward me 10 million dollars for the illegal restraint.I was held in violation of Constitutional Law # 250.2 (4) which provides: Every Black Man has a right under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution U.S.C.A., that in the selection of jurors to pass on his life, liberty, or property, there shall be no exclusion of his race & no discrimination because of their color. Virginia v. Rives 100 U.S. 313.The trial transcripts affirm it to be fact that Blacks were excluded from the jury venire, there was no cross section of the community, & Judge David Kiely imposed an all White jury despite being told he was violating the 14th Amendment.To: The House Judiciary committeeFrom: Jesha Miller 812-480-9338 Page 2.With corruption in the U.S. Supreme Court the appellate system does not work, justifying immediate action concerning this complaint redressing government due to corruption throughout the entire judicial branch of government.Federal Judge Sarah Evans Barker refused to enforce the rule of law by issuing an indictment & arrest warrant for Judge David Kiely pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243. Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller & his associate Betsy M. Isenberg refused to enforce the rule of law, as did Public Integrity Section Head- Raymond Hulser. All were given 2nd opportunities to withdraw as accomplices but acted in concealment so they must be held accountable for their actions. Judge Barker violates my rights under color of law by denying my 7th Amendment right to trial by jury that was demanded in the Civil suit.Both Judge Barker & Young protected the media from civil suit who aid & abetted Judge David Kiely from justice by concealment of the Federal crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 from the public. Frivolous lawsuits are those filed by a party or attorney who is aware they are without merit, because of a lack of supporting legal argument or factual basis for the claims. As you have seen there is material evidence from the trial transcripts supporting the legal argument that officials have violated the unalienable right to a fair trial protected under the 6th Amendment of the Bill of rights that government must protect. [ Judgements entered as Evidence ]The 1st Amendment guarantees the right to redress government- meaning to correct & President Barack Obama has ignored every petition redressing government when executed by the Bill of Rights, rights that government must protect. Judge David Kiely violates the 5th, 6th, & 14th Amendments which holds government to the rule of law, guarantees the right to a fair trial, & the right to due process. This is sent as evidence [ from the trial transcripts ] in violation of the unalienable right " all men are created equal" which means- every citizen has the right to a fair trial under the 6th Amendment. Officials have been elected & taken an oath to uphold the Constitution & these officials violating the 13th & 14th Amendments violate the Amendments that were made to protect the rights of Blacks & later the 14th Amendment helped all Americans seek justice. When the constitutions checks & balances have been petitioned this puts into question the integrity of that Branch of government & as intended by the Framers of the constitution that Branch of government must be checked for abuse of power, corruption, protect the rights of the people, & those in violation held accountable for their actions as when they were used when President Nixon was President.Again, the BILL OF RIGHTS IS WHAT ANY CITIZEN USES AGAINST ANY GOVERNMENT ON EARTH & WHAT NO JUST GOVERNMENT CAN REFUSE OR RESTON INFERENCE. Because those officials filed against have refused to address the constitutions checks & balances is proof of guilt within itself justifying you stop allother tasks & address this immediately as it is of National importance. The ideals of this nation are its constitution guaranteeing the right to freedom, justice, equality, & the pursuit of happiness.We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.To: The House Judiciary CommitteeFrom: Jesha Miller 812-480- 9338 Page 3.A corrupt government cannot justify any arrest when they themselves refuse to adhere to the law as guaranteed by the BILL OF RIGHTS 5th Amendment. The reality is American corruption in the legal system is well hidden by American Corporate owned media. Government officials in-turn were not forced to address my petitioning the use of the Constitutions checks & balances due to abuse of power as intended by the Framers of the Constitution.CORRUPTION- is the abuse of power by a public official in which part of the system is either not performing duties it was originally intended to or performing them in an improper way to the detriment of the systems original purpose.Government officials refusing to honor the Constitutions checks & balances is a prime example of that corruption that I bring to your attention. The President, Judges, Senate & House of Representatives office is a position of trust where one receives authority in order to act on behalf of the public. The crime committed by Judge David Kiely pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 is against the peace & dignity of the U.S., as Slavery has been abolished, violating the 13th Amendment, & is at war with Democracy. With corrupt officials you have a corrupt Judicial system which not only violate the basic right to equality before the law, but deny procedural rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. TO SECURE THESE RIGHTSGOVERNMENT IS INSTITUTED BY MEN & AS IT IS SELF EVIDENT THAT THESE MENARE DESTRUCTIVE TO NO END & IT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE CORRUPT THAT MY RIGHT TO FREEDOM, JUSTICE, EQUALITY, & THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED THAT THE HOUSE JUDICIARY MUST ACT IMMEDIATELY BY SETTING A DATE FOR ME TO BE IN WASHINGTON SO THIS CLAIM AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED. The dismissal by Federal Judges Sarah Evans Barker & Federal Judge Richard Young have only been to hide this corruption in their Branch of government which is a conflict of interest. They should be impeached with such actions of trying to be Judge, Jury, & final Judgement as there is no avenue to justice with the U.S. Supreme Court corruption being what they are hiding, that the entire Judicial Branch of government is corrupt is what will be proven when the Constitutions checks & balances are performed as intended by the Framers of the Constitution to prevent abuse of power.An illegal act by an office holder constitutes Political & judicial corruption onlyif the Act is directly related to their official duties & in the Civil Complaint each defendant is guilty because it is related directly to their duty as stated in the complaint. { Case No. 3:11-cv-013-RLY-WGH } This is on blog by going to jeshamillervsbarackobama.blogspot.com.There at the blog it specifically states what each official did violating his duty, for instance, President Barack Obama- Article II, sec. 3, of the Constitution, failing to see that the laws are faithfully executed & Judge David Kiely- FAILS TO PERFORM HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY- recognized by sec. 4 of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of March 1, 1875...NOT TO PURSUE A CONDUCT IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THEIR OFFICE which would OPERATE TO DISCRIMINATE in the SELECTION OF JURORS ON RACIAL GROUNDS. This is Judicial corruption directly related to his duty. Moreover, if petitioner's allegations are true, the responsible officials are subject to criminal penalties. 18 U.S.C. § 243.All officials in the lawsuit against the U.S. failed in the discharge of official responsibilities so I filed Civil Suit. The buck stops with the President to uphold the integrity of the Constitution & by his failure government is running a corrupt government. This violates the 1st Amendment to redress government so that the violation of Constitutional rights are corrected which they have refused to do.The denial of the right to a fair trial is MAJOR BEING IN VIOLATION OF THE UNALIENALBLE RIGHT " ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL." This is a right I cannot be separated from.The U.S. Attorney General- Eric Holder was required to appear in person before the U.S. Supreme Court due to abuse of power & corruption, denial of freedom, & dereliction of Duty in the discharge of official responsibilities by Former Justices Sandra Day O'Connor & John Paul Stevens but failed to do so. Court records will show he was petitioned to enforce Title 18 sec. 243 against Judge David Kiely & Federal Judge Sarah Evan Barker for denying rights under color of law in an effort to continue concealing the Constitutions checks & balances which would expose corruption in the entire Judicial Branch of government. Since I petitioned the checks & balances government must acknowledge the checks & balances so that I must be given the chance to prove whether or not this Branch is corrupt & have abused their power. These are the actions of officials to hide corruption in the Judicial Branch of which they are a part of & are accomplices who've refused to withdraw.Title 18 USC sec. 242 provides that whoever, under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States ...shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD YOUNG & SARAH EVANS BARKER deprive me of the 7th Amendment Right to a trial by jury in full knowledge there is evidence of a crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243. This case has merit to be deserving of money for the illegal imprisonment of seven years as I am a Journeyman Machinist, Veteran of the Viet-nam Era, & had a publishing company for songs. The unalienable right " all men are created equal" is of such major importance being with the Bill of Rights that the Constitution itself would not be ratified without the guaranteed right to freedom & justice. These actions by the highest officials in the land warrant refusing their duties as required by the Constitution are of such major importance that the Constitution requires impeachment for not upholding the integrity of the Constitution. This right to equality is ingraved in stone on the front of the U.S. Supreme Court so for Justices to have committed corruption & dereliction of duty to cover-up a Federal Crime by officials & deny 10 million upon my release is National News that should have been treated as such had it not been for the media being accomplices to the crimeby concealment. Where, as in this case, timely objection has laid bare a discrimination in the selection of grand jurors, the conviction cannot stand, because the Constitution prohibits the procedure by which it was obtained."Id. at 316 U. S. 406. In Strauder, the Court observed that the exclusion of Negroes from jury service injures not only defendants, but also other members of the excluded class: it denies the class of potential jurors the "privilege of participating equally . . . in the administration of justice," 100 U.S. at 100 U. S. 308, and it stigmatizes the whole class, even those who do not wish to participate, by declaring them unfit for jury service, and thereby putting "a brand upon them, affixed by law, an assertion of their inferiority." Ibid. It is now clear that injunctive relief is available to vindicate these interests of the excluded jurors and the stigmatized class.Page 407 U. S. 500The crime, and the unconstitutional state action, occur whether the defendant is white or Negro, whether he is acquitted or convicted. Illegal and unconstitutional jury selection procedures cast doubt on the integrity of the whole judicial process. Having resolved the question of standing, we turn briefly to the further disposition of this case. There is, of course, no question here of justifying the system under attack. For whatever may be the law with regard to other exclusions from jury service, it is clear beyond all doubt that the exclusion of Negroes cannot pass constitutional muster. Accordingly, if petitioner's allegations are correct, and Negroes were systematically excluded from his grand and petit juries, then he was indicted and convicted by tribunals that fail to satisfy the elementary requirements of due process, and neither the indictment nor the conviction can stand.To: The House Judiciary CommitteeFrom: Jesha Miller 812-480-9338 Page 5The U.S. Supreme Court have a duty, when addressed by Habeas Corpus to check the records & if true, release the Petitioner from the illegal restraint. Trial transcripts are material evidence proving Judge David Kiely failed his Constitutional duty & denied due process under color of law violating the 5th, 6th, & 14th Amendments. { Faxed with claim against U.S. } Because petitioner's allegations are true, not only is he subject to criminal penalties pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243, but President Barack Obama, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Federal Judges Sarah Evans Barker & Richard Young aided & abetted Judge David Kiely from justice by refusing to enforce the rule of law & violated my Rights Under Color of Law. Congressman Larry Bucshon who refused to take my Article of Impeachment to the floor also aids Judge David Kiely from justice & violates the code of conduct by his refusal to report corruption wherever found. This is on blog at-- articleofimpeachmentbyjeshamiller.blogspot.comArt. 1 Sec 9 - Powers denied government - The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. This proves abuse of power by Former Justices Sandra Day O'Connor & John Paul Stevens under Article 1, Sec. 9 which specifically is a power denied government. Also proves there was an ulterior motive for Federal Judges Sarah Evans Barker & Federal Judge Richard Young dismissing the case as frivolous which was to hide corruption in the highest Court in the land which would be proven by the checks & balances.Sec. 243 was intended to serve two purposes; 1st to make explicit what was implicit in the 14th Amendment, that persons cannot be denied the right to serve on juries because of their race & 2nd, TO PREVENT RACIAL EXCLUSIONS FROM JURIES BY PROVING CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR PERSONS VIOLATING THE STATUTORY COMMAND.ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENTWhen a resolution of Article of Impeachment is introduced in the House of Representatives a special committee shall ( meaning must ) immediately be created for the sole purpose of investigation & consideration of the Article of Impeachment with the same powers as any standing committee of the Legislature. As my Representative of the House, Congressman Larry Bucshon is petitioned to immediately take these Articles of Impeachment to the Floor to formally accuse these officials of a crime related to official duties this 5th, Day of January, 2011. The motion to impeach needs 2/3 vote for a major offense. The resolution of Article of impeachment is written by Jesha Miller, the constituent of Larry Bucshon.18 USC sec. 245 provided that Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, intimidates or interferes with any person from participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; [or] applying for or enjoying, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States; shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.42 USC sec. 1983 provides that every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Colombia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.The media interfered by denying my Constitutional Right # 925 which enablesevery citizen at anytime to bring the government & any person in authority to the bar of public opinion by any just criticism upon their conduct in the exercise of authority which the people have conferred upon them. These Civil Suits were dismissed also by Federal Judge Richard Young to cover-up Judicial Corruption.All media in the suit were given notice of warning of violating my rights under color of law & chose not to withdraw.To: The House Judiciary CommitteeFrom Jesha Miller 812-480-9338 Page 6 ( EMERGENCY HARDSHIP )The motive of these corrupt officials is to delay exposure of corruption & the use of the Constitutions Checks & Balances for as long as possible in hope that death before this is exposed to the public so that they are not held accountable.The case is not frivolous because the right to freedom, justice, equality, & the pursuit of happiness are the ideals of this Nation & guaranteed by it's Constitution. It certainly has merit in that Slavery has been abolished so in being held I am justifiably to be paid front pay, back pay, & any pay that I could have made with my Publishing company while being illegally imprisoned which was 10 million that was to be paid upon my release. Because government chose to abuse its power by suspending the Habeas Corpus, defaulted on the Guaranteed rights of the Bill of Rights, & refused to acknowledge the Constitutions Checks & Balances to continue this corruption I am also entitled to 40 Million in punitive Damages which is established to prevent officials from acting in defiance of the Constitution & abusing the authority & power which the people have placed upon them. { Faxed is the relief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court in case No. 04-7377 so Federal Judges Sarah Evans Barker & Richard Young certainly knew they entered a false judgement in order to oppress me, Jesha Miller from getting any money & clearing my name of being a felon. } Had it not been for the oppression by these officials I would be economically secure. Oppression is the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner. 2. an act or instance of oppressing. Prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control.Government officials oppressed me in case No. 04-7377 & they continued this in case No. 3:11-cv-013-RLY-WGH & in the case against the media which is Case No. 3:10 -cr- 51 RLY - WGH. They held Blacks in 400 years of Slavery without any pay & todays officials continue that kind of treatment to me in these days & times. Because it is government who denied the right to a fair trial, violates the 5th Amendment that holds government to the rule of law & Judge Sarah Evans Barker refused to enforce the rule of law to aid a fellow official & this is in her ruling as material evidence I am entitled to advance in money as a show of good faith by this government is easing the oppression that they have prolonged against me in the form of 2 million dollars within the next five days.It is because this abuse of power is directly related to their duties under the Constitution that the Lawsuit in case No. 3:11 - cv- 013- RLY- WGH be immediately reinstated in addition to advancing two ( 2 ) Million Dollars into my account & reinstate the law suit against the media for their concealment which aids & abets a criminal from justice.To: House Judiciary CommitteeFrom Jesha Miller 812-480-9338 Page 7The Courts were previously petitioned advance money & refused which resulted in my eviction from the previous address of 1011 Lincoln Ave. Evansville In. My health continued to decline as I'm in need of dental work, rehabilitation for my back, & not enough food to eat to keep up my health in the proper way. The area where I live now is contaminated so i'm there again due to my economic condition.My vehicle needs a transmission, tires, & new winshield. I've applied for car loans for 2005 Chrysler 300 at Kenny Kent used cars & an 06 model to no avail so I'm forced to drive a car in poor condition. I'm still writing music but lost my music equipment while being illegally imprisoned but have a keyboard in layaway with approximately 900more dollars to pay on that. I also need an office & equipment to assemble my presentation on my visit to Washington to address the Committee concerning my claim against the U.S.The guaranteed Rights of the Constitution cannot be merely promised, but must be carried out by those officials who have taken an oath to uphold the integrity of our Constitution of the U.S.Because they have failed & I fax material evidence that what I say is the truth, in a show of good faith you must advance the 2 Million Dollars to ease the oppression that the government has put upon me.Other wise the oppression continues & "we the peoples " rights are in grave danger justifying a change in government because this is not how the Framers of the Constitution intended. First, to protect the freedom of each person. Government violated the 5th & 14 th Amendment holding government to the rule of law & committed a crime pursuant to Title 18 sec. 243 to take my freedom when the crime is aghainst the peace & dignity of the United States violating the 13th Amendment & is war with Democracy. Second, is to prevent abuse of power by government. The U.S. Supreme Court abused its power by suspending a Habeas Corpus which was addressed to former Justices Sandra Day O'Connor & Justice John Paul Stevens which is dereliction of the duty to examine the records & if true release the petitioner from the illegal restraint. This is the third violation by the U.S. Supreme Court, to protect people who are accused of crimes.`{ When a man is brought by Habeas Corpus to the Supreme Court & upon retorn of it, it apprears to the Court that was against law imprison'd & detain'd, he shall never be by the Act of the Court remanded to his unlawful imprisonment, for then the Court should do an act of Injustice in imprisoning him, de nova, against law. }Specifically I was held in violation of Constitutional Law # 250.2 (4) which provides: Every Black Man has a right under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution U.S.C.A., that in the selection of jurors to pass on his life, liberty, or property, there shall be no exclusion of his race, & no discrimination against them because of their color. Virginia v, Rives 100 U.S. 313To: The House Judiciary CommitteeFrom : Jesha Miller 812-480-9338 Page 8These Rights are under the Bill of Rights that are guaranteed by government, that government must protect. Guarantee assures a particular outcome & you having jurisdiction are to assume responsibility for the debt, default on the money in case No. 04-7377 which is a total of 50 Million Dollars, & the miscarriage of justice so that this felony is removed from my record. { Submitted with this complaint against the U.S. is a email from Adecco stating the reason I was not employed was because of the felony on my record so this also oppresses me continually which is all the reason to advance money that I am would already have were it not for government corruption by its officials which is 2 million dollars. I must pay insurance, rent, & food & clothing.{ Contact me to put the money in my account at 812-480-9338 }{ Contact me in Seven (7) days concerning your act of goodfaith by putting 2 Million Dollars into an account in my name.This would by May 26, 2011. Also set a date within the next threeweeks from May 19, 2011 to address this in person in Washington. }Respectfully Submitted- Jesha Miller ________________________Date: May 19, 2011Exhibits FaxedClerks Certificate 2 pagesBlacks excluded which are my race in violation of the 5th, & 14th Amendments. This is evidence of the crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 & the 6th Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury by Judge David Kiely. This is evidence there was no cross section of the community as required by Federal Law. 4 PagesSupreme Court stamp on caption of Case No. 04-7377 2 pagesPage 29 Affirming Injunctive Relief With Reparations proving there is merit to pay advance due to the Judicial Branch's oppression.Caption of Civil Rights complaint against the U.S. 1 pageCase No. # : 11 -cv- 013 RLY- WGHRuling by Judge Richard Young dismissing as Frivolous 1 page.Email from Adecco stating the felony is reason I could not get hiredwhich also oppresses me economically. 1 pageRuling by Judge Sarah Evans Barker that violates my rights under color of law by denying the 7th Amendment right to trial by jury.1 Page.Total Faxed is 8 pages on complaint & 12 exhibits. 20 pages

No comments:

Post a Comment